Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sanger to Eastvale
This post compares Sanger, California to Eastvale, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sanger (city) | Eastvale (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,883 | 59,733 |
| Income (median) | $35,793 | $61,490 |
| Home Value (median) | $178,900 | $496,000 |
| White | 77% | 42% |
| Black | 0% | 8% |
| Asian | 2% | 26% |
| With Kids | 49% | 57% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 33 |
| Rentals | 42% | 24% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sanger or Eastvale?
A: Sanger has a much smaller population count than Eastvale: 24883 compared with 59733 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sanger or in Eastvale?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Sanger.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sanger or Eastvale?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Sanger.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Sanger does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Sanger versus 24% for Eastvale.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sanger may include: Calexico, Porterville, and Selma.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z