Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sanger to Culver City
This post compares Sanger, California to Culver City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sanger (city) | Culver City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,883 | 39,432 |
| Income (median) | $35,793 | $65,816 |
| Home Value (median) | $178,900 | $735,600 |
| White | 77% | 62% |
| Black | 0% | 7% |
| Asian | 2% | 15% |
| With Kids | 49% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 40 |
| Rentals | 42% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sanger or Culver City?
A: Sanger has a smaller population count than Culver City: 24883 compared with 39432 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sanger or in Culver City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Sanger.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sanger or Culver City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Sanger.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Culver City does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 42% for Sanger versus 46% for Culver City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sanger may include: Calexico, Porterville, and Selma.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z