Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sanger to Cudahy
This post compares Sanger, California to Cudahy, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sanger (city) | Cudahy (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,883 | 24,146 |
| Income (median) | $35,793 | $26,980 |
| Home Value (median) | $178,900 | $327,500 |
| White | 77% | 77% |
| Black | 0% | 0% |
| Asian | 2% | 0% |
| With Kids | 49% | 60% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 27 |
| Rentals | 42% | 85% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sanger or Cudahy?
A: Sanger has a similar population count than Cudahy: 24883 compared with 24146 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sanger or in Cudahy?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Sanger.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sanger or Cudahy?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Sanger.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Cudahy does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Sanger versus 85% for Cudahy.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sanger may include: Calexico, Porterville, and Selma.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z