Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sanger to Concord
This post compares Sanger, California to Concord, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sanger (city) | Concord (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,883 | 128,160 |
| Income (median) | $35,793 | $56,608 |
| Home Value (median) | $178,900 | $461,700 |
| White | 77% | 67% |
| Black | 0% | 3% |
| Asian | 2% | 11% |
| With Kids | 49% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 38 |
| Rentals | 42% | 40% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sanger or Concord?
A: Sanger has a much smaller population count than Concord: 24883 compared with 128160 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sanger or in Concord?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Sanger.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sanger or Concord?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Sanger.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Sanger does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 42% for Sanger versus 40% for Concord.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sanger may include: Calexico, Porterville, and Selma.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z