Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sanger to Claremont
This post compares Sanger, California to Claremont, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Sanger (city) | Claremont (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 24,883 | 35,949 |
Income (median) | $35,793 | $75,241 |
Home Value (median) | $178,900 | $605,700 |
White | 77% | 65% |
Black | 0% | 5% |
Asian | 2% | 13% |
With Kids | 49% | 29% |
Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
Rentals | 42% | 34% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sanger or Claremont?
A: Sanger has a smaller population count than Claremont: 24883 compared with 35949 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sanger or in Claremont?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Sanger.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sanger or Claremont?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Sanger.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Sanger does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Sanger versus 34% for Claremont.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sanger may include: Calexico, Porterville, and Selma.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z