Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sanger to Burbank
This post compares Sanger, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sanger (city) | Burbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,883 | 104,765 |
| Income (median) | $35,793 | $57,804 |
| Home Value (median) | $178,900 | $574,300 |
| White | 77% | 70% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 2% | 11% |
| With Kids | 49% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
| Rentals | 42% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sanger or Burbank?
A: Sanger has a much smaller population count than Burbank: 24883 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sanger or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Sanger.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sanger or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Sanger.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Sanger versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sanger may include: Calexico, Porterville, and Selma.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z