Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sanger to Beverly Hills
This post compares Sanger, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sanger (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,883 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $35,793 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $178,900 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 77% | 82% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 2% | 9% |
| With Kids | 49% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 43 |
| Rentals | 42% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sanger or Beverly Hills?
A: Sanger has a smaller population count than Beverly Hills: 24883 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sanger or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Sanger.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sanger or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Sanger.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Sanger versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sanger may include: Calexico, Porterville, and Selma.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z