Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sanger to Bakersfield
This post compares Sanger, California to Bakersfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sanger (city) | Bakersfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,883 | 372,680 |
| Income (median) | $35,793 | $44,447 |
| Home Value (median) | $178,900 | $228,400 |
| White | 77% | 68% |
| Black | 0% | 7% |
| Asian | 2% | 7% |
| With Kids | 49% | 45% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 30 |
| Rentals | 42% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sanger or Bakersfield?
A: Sanger has a much smaller population count than Bakersfield: 24883 compared with 372680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sanger or in Bakersfield?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Sanger.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sanger or Bakersfield?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Sanger.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bakersfield does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 42% for Sanger versus 43% for Bakersfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sanger may include: Calexico, Porterville, and Selma.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z