Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sanger to Ashland
This post compares Sanger, California to Ashland, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Sanger (city) | Ashland (CDP) |
---|---|---|
Population | 24,883 | 24,477 |
Income (median) | $35,793 | $40,407 |
Home Value (median) | $178,900 | $396,400 |
White | 77% | 44% |
Black | 0% | 17% |
Asian | 2% | 20% |
With Kids | 49% | 42% |
Age (median) | 32 | 32 |
Rentals | 42% | 68% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sanger or Ashland?
A: Sanger has a similar population count than Ashland: 24883 compared with 24477 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sanger or in Ashland?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Sanger.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sanger or Ashland?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Sanger.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Sanger versus 68% for Ashland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sanger may include: Calexico, Porterville, and Selma.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z