Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Ramon to South Lake Tahoe
This post compares San Ramon, California to South Lake Tahoe, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Ramon (city) | South Lake Tahoe (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 75,048 | 21,680 |
| Income (median) | $104,587 | $40,695 |
| Home Value (median) | $863,800 | $374,600 |
| White | 44% | 81% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 44% | 3% |
| With Kids | 52% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 38 |
| Rentals | 29% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Ramon or South Lake Tahoe?
A: San Ramon has a larger population count than South Lake Tahoe: 75048 compared with 21680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Ramon or in South Lake Tahoe?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in San Ramon.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Ramon or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in San Ramon.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Lake Tahoe does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for San Ramon versus 54% for South Lake Tahoe.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Ramon may include: Dublin, Pleasanton, and Fremont.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z