Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Mateo to South Pasadena
This post compares San Mateo, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Mateo (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 103,500 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $75,635 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $921,700 | $928,500 |
| White | 57% | 54% |
| Black | 2% | 3% |
| Asian | 22% | 29% |
| With Kids | 30% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 40 |
| Rentals | 45% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Mateo or South Pasadena?
A: San Mateo has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 103500 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Mateo or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average similar in San Mateo.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Mateo or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in San Mateo.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for San Mateo versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Mateo may include: Campbell, Redwood-City, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z