Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Mateo to South El Monte
This post compares San Mateo, California to South El Monte, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Mateo (city) | South El Monte (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 103,500 | 20,712 |
| Income (median) | $75,635 | $28,039 |
| Home Value (median) | $921,700 | $389,400 |
| White | 57% | 59% |
| Black | 2% | 0% |
| Asian | 22% | 14% |
| With Kids | 30% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 34 |
| Rentals | 45% | 52% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Mateo or South El Monte?
A: San Mateo has a much larger population count than South El Monte: 103500 compared with 20712 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Mateo or in South El Monte?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in San Mateo.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Mateo or South El Monte?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in San Mateo.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South El Monte does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 45% for San Mateo versus 52% for South El Monte.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Mateo may include: Campbell, Redwood-City, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z