Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Mateo to Selma
This post compares San Mateo, California to Selma, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | San Mateo (city) | Selma (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 103,500 | 24,537 |
Income (median) | $75,635 | $35,716 |
Home Value (median) | $921,700 | $171,200 |
White | 57% | 78% |
Black | 2% | 0% |
Asian | 22% | 4% |
With Kids | 30% | 54% |
Age (median) | 38 | 30 |
Rentals | 45% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Mateo or Selma?
A: San Mateo has a much larger population count than Selma: 103500 compared with 24537 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Mateo or in Selma?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in San Mateo.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Mateo or Selma?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in San Mateo.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Mateo does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 45% for San Mateo versus 41% for Selma.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Mateo may include: Campbell, Redwood-City, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z