Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Mateo to San Bruno
This post compares San Mateo, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Mateo (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 103,500 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $75,635 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $921,700 | $754,700 |
| White | 57% | 49% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 22% | 28% |
| With Kids | 30% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 39 |
| Rentals | 45% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Mateo or San Bruno?
A: San Mateo has a larger population count than San Bruno: 103500 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Mateo or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average higher in San Mateo.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Mateo or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in San Mateo.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Mateo does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 45% for San Mateo versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Mateo may include: Campbell, Redwood-City, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z