Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Mateo to Pico Rivera
This post compares San Mateo, California to Pico Rivera, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Mateo (city) | Pico Rivera (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 103,500 | 63,750 |
| Income (median) | $75,635 | $36,529 |
| Home Value (median) | $921,700 | $380,200 |
| White | 57% | 55% |
| Black | 2% | 0% |
| Asian | 22% | 3% |
| With Kids | 30% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 36 |
| Rentals | 45% | 33% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Mateo or Pico Rivera?
A: San Mateo has a larger population count than Pico Rivera: 103500 compared with 63750 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Mateo or in Pico Rivera?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in San Mateo.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Mateo or Pico Rivera?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in San Mateo.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Mateo does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for San Mateo versus 33% for Pico Rivera.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Mateo may include: Campbell, Redwood-City, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z