Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Mateo to Laguna Hills
This post compares San Mateo, California to Laguna Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Mateo (city) | Laguna Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 103,500 | 31,235 |
| Income (median) | $75,635 | $58,400 |
| Home Value (median) | $921,700 | $649,700 |
| White | 57% | 69% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 22% | 14% |
| With Kids | 30% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 41 |
| Rentals | 45% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Mateo or Laguna Hills?
A: San Mateo has a larger population count than Laguna Hills: 103500 compared with 31235 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Mateo or in Laguna Hills?
A: Incomes are on average higher in San Mateo.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Mateo or Laguna Hills?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in San Mateo.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Mateo does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for San Mateo versus 29% for Laguna Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Mateo may include: Campbell, Redwood-City, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z