Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Mateo to Beverly Hills
This post compares San Mateo, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Mateo (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 103,500 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $75,635 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $921,700 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 57% | 82% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 22% | 9% |
| With Kids | 30% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 43 |
| Rentals | 45% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Mateo or Beverly Hills?
A: San Mateo has a larger population count than Beverly Hills: 103500 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Mateo or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average similar in San Mateo.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Mateo or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in San Mateo.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for San Mateo versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Mateo may include: Campbell, Redwood-City, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z