Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Mateo to Belmont
This post compares San Mateo, California to Belmont, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Mateo (city) | Belmont (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 103,500 | 27,110 |
| Income (median) | $75,635 | $107,466 |
| Home Value (median) | $921,700 | $1,174,200 |
| White | 57% | 62% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 22% | 27% |
| With Kids | 30% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 39 |
| Rentals | 45% | 40% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Mateo or Belmont?
A: San Mateo has a larger population count than Belmont: 103500 compared with 27110 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Mateo or in Belmont?
A: Incomes are on average lower in San Mateo.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Mateo or Belmont?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in San Mateo.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Mateo does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 45% for San Mateo versus 40% for Belmont.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Mateo may include: Campbell, Redwood-City, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z