Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Mateo to Ashland
This post compares San Mateo, California to Ashland, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Mateo (city) | Ashland (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 103,500 | 24,477 |
| Income (median) | $75,635 | $40,407 |
| Home Value (median) | $921,700 | $396,400 |
| White | 57% | 44% |
| Black | 2% | 17% |
| Asian | 22% | 20% |
| With Kids | 30% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 32 |
| Rentals | 45% | 68% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Mateo or Ashland?
A: San Mateo has a much larger population count than Ashland: 103500 compared with 24477 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Mateo or in Ashland?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in San Mateo.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Mateo or Ashland?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in San Mateo.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for San Mateo versus 68% for Ashland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Mateo may include: Campbell, Redwood-City, and South-Pasadena.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z