Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Marcos to South San Francisco
This post compares San Marcos, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Marcos (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 93,493 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $50,338 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $455,700 | $697,400 |
| White | 71% | 33% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 9% | 39% |
| With Kids | 41% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 39 |
| Rentals | 38% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Marcos or South San Francisco?
A: San Marcos has a larger population count than South San Francisco: 93493 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Marcos or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average similar in San Marcos.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Marcos or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in San Marcos.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for San Marcos versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Marcos may include: Manteca, Clovis, and Corona.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z