Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Marcos to South Pasadena
This post compares San Marcos, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | San Marcos (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 93,493 | 25,974 |
Income (median) | $50,338 | $74,034 |
Home Value (median) | $455,700 | $928,500 |
White | 71% | 54% |
Black | 2% | 3% |
Asian | 9% | 29% |
With Kids | 41% | 34% |
Age (median) | 35 | 40 |
Rentals | 38% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Marcos or South Pasadena?
A: San Marcos has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 93493 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Marcos or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in San Marcos.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Marcos or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in San Marcos.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for San Marcos versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Marcos may include: Manteca, Clovis, and Corona.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z