Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Marcos to Pasadena
This post compares San Marcos, California to Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Marcos (city) | Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 93,493 | 141,231 |
| Income (median) | $50,338 | $59,401 |
| Home Value (median) | $455,700 | $689,700 |
| White | 71% | 53% |
| Black | 2% | 10% |
| Asian | 9% | 16% |
| With Kids | 41% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 37 |
| Rentals | 38% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Marcos or Pasadena?
A: San Marcos has a smaller population count than Pasadena: 93493 compared with 141231 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Marcos or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in San Marcos.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Marcos or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in San Marcos.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for San Marcos versus 56% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Marcos may include: Manteca, Clovis, and Corona.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z