Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Marcos to Laguna Hills
This post compares San Marcos, California to Laguna Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Marcos (city) | Laguna Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 93,493 | 31,235 |
| Income (median) | $50,338 | $58,400 |
| Home Value (median) | $455,700 | $649,700 |
| White | 71% | 69% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 9% | 14% |
| With Kids | 41% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 41 |
| Rentals | 38% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Marcos or Laguna Hills?
A: San Marcos has a larger population count than Laguna Hills: 93493 compared with 31235 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Marcos or in Laguna Hills?
A: Incomes are on average lower in San Marcos.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Marcos or Laguna Hills?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in San Marcos.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Marcos does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for San Marcos versus 29% for Laguna Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Marcos may include: Manteca, Clovis, and Corona.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z