Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Marcos to Beverly Hills
This post compares San Marcos, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Marcos (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 93,493 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $50,338 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $455,700 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 71% | 82% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 9% | 9% |
| With Kids | 41% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 43 |
| Rentals | 38% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Marcos or Beverly Hills?
A: San Marcos has a larger population count than Beverly Hills: 93493 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Marcos or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in San Marcos.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Marcos or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in San Marcos.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for San Marcos versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Marcos may include: Manteca, Clovis, and Corona.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z