Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Jose to South Pasadena
This post compares San Jose, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | San Jose (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,023,031 | 25,974 |
Income (median) | $61,896 | $74,034 |
Home Value (median) | $714,200 | $928,500 |
White | 40% | 54% |
Black | 3% | 3% |
Asian | 34% | 29% |
With Kids | 38% | 34% |
Age (median) | 36 | 40 |
Rentals | 42% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Jose or South Pasadena?
A: San Jose has a much larger population count than South Pasadena: 1023031 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Jose or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in San Jose.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Jose or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in San Jose.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for San Jose versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Jose may include: San-Diego, San-Francisco, and Irvine.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z