Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Jose to Laguna Hills
This post compares San Jose, California to Laguna Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Jose (city) | Laguna Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,023,031 | 31,235 |
| Income (median) | $61,896 | $58,400 |
| Home Value (median) | $714,200 | $649,700 |
| White | 40% | 69% |
| Black | 3% | 2% |
| Asian | 34% | 14% |
| With Kids | 38% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 36 | 41 |
| Rentals | 42% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Jose or Laguna Hills?
A: San Jose has a much larger population count than Laguna Hills: 1023031 compared with 31235 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Jose or in Laguna Hills?
A: Incomes are on average similar in San Jose.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Jose or Laguna Hills?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in San Jose.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Jose does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for San Jose versus 29% for Laguna Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Jose may include: San-Diego, San-Francisco, and Irvine.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z