Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Francisco to West Hollywood
This post compares San Francisco, California to West Hollywood, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Francisco (city) | West Hollywood (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 864,263 | 36,148 |
| Income (median) | $74,841 | $63,795 |
| Home Value (median) | $927,400 | $684,200 |
| White | 47% | 79% |
| Black | 5% | 4% |
| Asian | 34% | 5% |
| With Kids | 18% | 3% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 39 |
| Rentals | 62% | 78% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Francisco or West Hollywood?
A: San Francisco has a much larger population count than West Hollywood: 864263 compared with 36148 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Francisco or in West Hollywood?
A: Incomes are on average higher in San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Francisco or West Hollywood?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: West Hollywood does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 62% for San Francisco versus 78% for West Hollywood.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Francisco may include: San-Jose, Irvine, and Long-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z