Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Francisco to South Pasadena
This post compares San Francisco, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Francisco (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 864,263 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $74,841 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $927,400 | $928,500 |
| White | 47% | 54% |
| Black | 5% | 3% |
| Asian | 34% | 29% |
| With Kids | 18% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 40 |
| Rentals | 62% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Francisco or South Pasadena?
A: San Francisco has a much larger population count than South Pasadena: 864263 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Francisco or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average similar in San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Francisco or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 62% for San Francisco versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Francisco may include: San-Jose, Irvine, and Long-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z