Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Francisco to South El Monte
This post compares San Francisco, California to South El Monte, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Francisco (city) | South El Monte (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 864,263 | 20,712 |
| Income (median) | $74,841 | $28,039 |
| Home Value (median) | $927,400 | $389,400 |
| White | 47% | 59% |
| Black | 5% | 0% |
| Asian | 34% | 14% |
| With Kids | 18% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 34 |
| Rentals | 62% | 52% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Francisco or South El Monte?
A: San Francisco has a much larger population count than South El Monte: 864263 compared with 20712 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Francisco or in South El Monte?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Francisco or South El Monte?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 62% for San Francisco versus 52% for South El Monte.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Francisco may include: San-Jose, Irvine, and Long-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z