Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Francisco to San Bruno
This post compares San Francisco, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Francisco (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 864,263 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $74,841 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $927,400 | $754,700 |
| White | 47% | 49% |
| Black | 5% | 1% |
| Asian | 34% | 28% |
| With Kids | 18% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 39 |
| Rentals | 62% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Francisco or San Bruno?
A: San Francisco has a much larger population count than San Bruno: 864263 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Francisco or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average higher in San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Francisco or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 62% for San Francisco versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Francisco may include: San-Jose, Irvine, and Long-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z