Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Francisco to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares San Francisco, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Francisco (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 864,263 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $74,841 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $927,400 | $444,200 |
| White | 47% | 62% |
| Black | 5% | 9% |
| Asian | 34% | 13% |
| With Kids | 18% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 35 |
| Rentals | 62% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Francisco or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: San Francisco has a much larger population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 864263 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Francisco or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Francisco or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 62% for San Francisco versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Francisco may include: San-Jose, Irvine, and Long-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z