Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Francisco to Los Angeles
This post compares San Francisco, California to Los Angeles, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Francisco (city) | Los Angeles (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 864,263 | 3,949,776 |
| Income (median) | $74,841 | $40,932 |
| Home Value (median) | $927,400 | $549,800 |
| White | 47% | 52% |
| Black | 5% | 8% |
| Asian | 34% | 11% |
| With Kids | 18% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 35 |
| Rentals | 62% | 63% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Francisco or Los Angeles?
A: San Francisco has a much smaller population count than Los Angeles: 864263 compared with 3949776 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Francisco or in Los Angeles?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Francisco or Los Angeles?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Los Angeles does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 62% for San Francisco versus 63% for Los Angeles.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Francisco may include: San-Jose, Irvine, and Long-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z