Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Francisco to Livermore
This post compares San Francisco, California to Livermore, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Francisco (city) | Livermore (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 864,263 | 88,232 |
| Income (median) | $74,841 | $75,750 |
| Home Value (median) | $927,400 | $643,200 |
| White | 47% | 78% |
| Black | 5% | 1% |
| Asian | 34% | 10% |
| With Kids | 18% | 36% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 39 |
| Rentals | 62% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Francisco or Livermore?
A: San Francisco has a much larger population count than Livermore: 864263 compared with 88232 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Francisco or in Livermore?
A: Incomes are on average similar in San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Francisco or Livermore?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 62% for San Francisco versus 28% for Livermore.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Francisco may include: San-Jose, Irvine, and Long-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z