Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Francisco to Laguna Beach
This post compares San Francisco, California to Laguna Beach, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Francisco (city) | Laguna Beach (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 864,263 | 23,224 |
| Income (median) | $74,841 | $100,466 |
| Home Value (median) | $927,400 | $1,570,700 |
| White | 47% | 88% |
| Black | 5% | 0% |
| Asian | 34% | 4% |
| With Kids | 18% | 21% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 50 |
| Rentals | 62% | 37% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Francisco or Laguna Beach?
A: San Francisco has a much larger population count than Laguna Beach: 864263 compared with 23224 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Francisco or in Laguna Beach?
A: Incomes are on average lower in San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Francisco or Laguna Beach?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 62% for San Francisco versus 37% for Laguna Beach.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Francisco may include: San-Jose, Irvine, and Long-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z