Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Francisco to Imperial Beach
This post compares San Francisco, California to Imperial Beach, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Francisco (city) | Imperial Beach (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 864,263 | 27,270 |
| Income (median) | $74,841 | $39,262 |
| Home Value (median) | $927,400 | $433,400 |
| White | 47% | 71% |
| Black | 5% | 4% |
| Asian | 34% | 8% |
| With Kids | 18% | 37% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 31 |
| Rentals | 62% | 68% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Francisco or Imperial Beach?
A: San Francisco has a much larger population count than Imperial Beach: 864263 compared with 27270 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Francisco or in Imperial Beach?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Francisco or Imperial Beach?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Imperial Beach does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 62% for San Francisco versus 68% for Imperial Beach.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Francisco may include: San-Jose, Irvine, and Long-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z