Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Francisco to Fresno
This post compares San Francisco, California to Fresno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | San Francisco (city) | Fresno (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 864,263 | 519,037 |
Income (median) | $74,841 | $39,069 |
Home Value (median) | $927,400 | $206,800 |
White | 47% | 56% |
Black | 5% | 7% |
Asian | 34% | 13% |
With Kids | 18% | 41% |
Age (median) | 38 | 30 |
Rentals | 62% | 53% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Francisco or Fresno?
A: San Francisco has a larger population count than Fresno: 864263 compared with 519037 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Francisco or in Fresno?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Francisco or Fresno?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 62% for San Francisco versus 53% for Fresno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Francisco may include: San-Jose, Irvine, and Long-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z