Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Francisco to Burbank
This post compares San Francisco, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Francisco (city) | Burbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 864,263 | 104,765 |
| Income (median) | $74,841 | $57,804 |
| Home Value (median) | $927,400 | $574,300 |
| White | 47% | 70% |
| Black | 5% | 2% |
| Asian | 34% | 11% |
| With Kids | 18% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 39 |
| Rentals | 62% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Francisco or Burbank?
A: San Francisco has a much larger population count than Burbank: 864263 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Francisco or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average higher in San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Francisco or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 62% for San Francisco versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Francisco may include: San-Jose, Irvine, and Long-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z