Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Francisco to Beverly Hills
This post compares San Francisco, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Francisco (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 864,263 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $74,841 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $927,400 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 47% | 82% |
| Black | 5% | 1% |
| Asian | 34% | 9% |
| With Kids | 18% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 43 |
| Rentals | 62% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Francisco or Beverly Hills?
A: San Francisco has a much larger population count than Beverly Hills: 864263 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Francisco or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average similar in San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Francisco or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 62% for San Francisco versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Francisco may include: San-Jose, Irvine, and Long-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z