Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Francisco to Ashland
This post compares San Francisco, California to Ashland, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Francisco (city) | Ashland (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 864,263 | 24,477 |
| Income (median) | $74,841 | $40,407 |
| Home Value (median) | $927,400 | $396,400 |
| White | 47% | 44% |
| Black | 5% | 17% |
| Asian | 34% | 20% |
| With Kids | 18% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 32 |
| Rentals | 62% | 68% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Francisco or Ashland?
A: San Francisco has a much larger population count than Ashland: 864263 compared with 24477 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Francisco or in Ashland?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in San Francisco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Francisco or Ashland?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in San Francisco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 62% for San Francisco versus 68% for Ashland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Francisco may include: San-Jose, Irvine, and Long-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z