Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Fernando to Union City
This post compares San Fernando, California to Union City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Fernando (city) | Union City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,581 | 74,354 |
| Income (median) | $37,371 | $55,732 |
| Home Value (median) | $370,300 | $620,200 |
| White | 57% | 21% |
| Black | 1% | 5% |
| Asian | 1% | 53% |
| With Kids | 49% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 38 |
| Rentals | 45% | 34% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Fernando or Union City?
A: San Fernando has a much smaller population count than Union City: 24581 compared with 74354 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Fernando or in Union City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in San Fernando.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Fernando or Union City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in San Fernando.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Fernando does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for San Fernando versus 34% for Union City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Fernando may include: Los-Banos, Atwater, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z