Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Fernando to South San Jose Hills
This post compares San Fernando, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Fernando (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,581 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $37,371 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $370,300 | $322,800 |
| White | 57% | 36% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 1% | 10% |
| With Kids | 49% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 32 |
| Rentals | 45% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Fernando or South San Jose Hills?
A: San Fernando has a similar population count than South San Jose Hills: 24581 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Fernando or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average higher in San Fernando.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Fernando or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in San Fernando.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Fernando does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for San Fernando versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Fernando may include: Los-Banos, Atwater, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z