Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Fernando to South San Francisco
This post compares San Fernando, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Fernando (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,581 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $37,371 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $370,300 | $697,400 |
| White | 57% | 33% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 1% | 39% |
| With Kids | 49% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 39 |
| Rentals | 45% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Fernando or South San Francisco?
A: San Fernando has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 24581 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Fernando or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in San Fernando.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Fernando or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in San Fernando.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Fernando does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for San Fernando versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Fernando may include: Los-Banos, Atwater, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z