Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Fernando to South Lake Tahoe
This post compares San Fernando, California to South Lake Tahoe, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Fernando (city) | South Lake Tahoe (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,581 | 21,680 |
| Income (median) | $37,371 | $40,695 |
| Home Value (median) | $370,300 | $374,600 |
| White | 57% | 81% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 1% | 3% |
| With Kids | 49% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 38 |
| Rentals | 45% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Fernando or South Lake Tahoe?
A: San Fernando has a similar population count than South Lake Tahoe: 24581 compared with 21680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Fernando or in South Lake Tahoe?
A: Incomes are on average similar in San Fernando.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Fernando or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in San Fernando.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Lake Tahoe does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for San Fernando versus 54% for South Lake Tahoe.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Fernando may include: Los-Banos, Atwater, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z