Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Fernando to Simi Valley
This post compares San Fernando, California to Simi Valley, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Fernando (city) | Simi Valley (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,581 | 126,546 |
| Income (median) | $37,371 | $61,651 |
| Home Value (median) | $370,300 | $508,600 |
| White | 57% | 79% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 1% | 9% |
| With Kids | 49% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 40 |
| Rentals | 45% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Fernando or Simi Valley?
A: San Fernando has a much smaller population count than Simi Valley: 24581 compared with 126546 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Fernando or in Simi Valley?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in San Fernando.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Fernando or Simi Valley?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in San Fernando.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Fernando does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for San Fernando versus 28% for Simi Valley.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Fernando may include: Los-Banos, Atwater, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z