Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Fernando to San Francisco
This post compares San Fernando, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Fernando (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,581 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $37,371 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $370,300 | $927,400 |
| White | 57% | 47% |
| Black | 1% | 5% |
| Asian | 1% | 34% |
| With Kids | 49% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 38 |
| Rentals | 45% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Fernando or San Francisco?
A: San Fernando has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 24581 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Fernando or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in San Fernando.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Fernando or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in San Fernando.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for San Fernando versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Fernando may include: Los-Banos, Atwater, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z