Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Fernando to Rowland Heights
This post compares San Fernando, California to Rowland Heights, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Fernando (city) | Rowland Heights (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,581 | 50,572 |
| Income (median) | $37,371 | $42,165 |
| Home Value (median) | $370,300 | $594,400 |
| White | 57% | 24% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 1% | 61% |
| With Kids | 49% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 41 |
| Rentals | 45% | 34% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Fernando or Rowland Heights?
A: San Fernando has a much smaller population count than Rowland Heights: 24581 compared with 50572 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Fernando or in Rowland Heights?
A: Incomes are on average lower in San Fernando.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Fernando or Rowland Heights?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in San Fernando.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Fernando does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for San Fernando versus 34% for Rowland Heights.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Fernando may include: Los-Banos, Atwater, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z