Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Fernando to Riverbank
This post compares San Fernando, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Fernando (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,581 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $37,371 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $370,300 | $247,200 |
| White | 57% | 79% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 1% | 4% |
| With Kids | 49% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 32 |
| Rentals | 45% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Fernando or Riverbank?
A: San Fernando has a similar population count than Riverbank: 24581 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Fernando or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average lower in San Fernando.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Fernando or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in San Fernando.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Fernando does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for San Fernando versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Fernando may include: Los-Banos, Atwater, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z