Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Fernando to Redwood City
This post compares San Fernando, California to Redwood City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Fernando (city) | Redwood City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,581 | 84,368 |
| Income (median) | $37,371 | $70,131 |
| Home Value (median) | $370,300 | $1,016,700 |
| White | 57% | 60% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 1% | 14% |
| With Kids | 49% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 37 |
| Rentals | 45% | 49% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Fernando or Redwood City?
A: San Fernando has a much smaller population count than Redwood City: 24581 compared with 84368 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Fernando or in Redwood City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in San Fernando.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Fernando or Redwood City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in San Fernando.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redwood City does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 45% for San Fernando versus 49% for Redwood City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Fernando may include: Los-Banos, Atwater, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z