Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Fernando to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares San Fernando, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Fernando (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,581 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $37,371 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $370,300 | $444,200 |
| White | 57% | 62% |
| Black | 1% | 9% |
| Asian | 1% | 13% |
| With Kids | 49% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 35 |
| Rentals | 45% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Fernando or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: San Fernando has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 24581 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Fernando or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in San Fernando.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Fernando or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in San Fernando.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Fernando does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for San Fernando versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Fernando may include: Los-Banos, Atwater, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z