Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Fernando to Pittsburg
This post compares San Fernando, California to Pittsburg, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Fernando (city) | Pittsburg (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,581 | 69,449 |
| Income (median) | $37,371 | $46,928 |
| Home Value (median) | $370,300 | $324,500 |
| White | 57% | 33% |
| Black | 1% | 16% |
| Asian | 1% | 17% |
| With Kids | 49% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 35 |
| Rentals | 45% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Fernando or Pittsburg?
A: San Fernando has a much smaller population count than Pittsburg: 24581 compared with 69449 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Fernando or in Pittsburg?
A: Incomes are on average lower in San Fernando.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Fernando or Pittsburg?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in San Fernando.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Fernando does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 45% for San Fernando versus 43% for Pittsburg.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Fernando may include: Los-Banos, Atwater, and South-Whittier.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z